A judge’s “publicity order” in the Tyler Robinson case could impact thousands of potential witnesses to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. If the story is clean, why clamp down on speech?
After Charlie Kirk’s murder, the internet did what it always does: it panicked, picked villains, and started blaming the nearest political “other.” In that chaos, a name a lot of people had barely heard suddenly shot to the top of the feed: Nick Fuentes.
This video is not an endorsement of Fuentes. It’s a look at the pipeline that creates people like him, and why the establishment keeps fueling it.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: if you spend a generation telling young men they’re “toxic,” “oppressive,” and guilty from birth, some of them eventually stop arguing and start leaning into the label. Not because it’s right, but because it’s the only identity the culture seems willing to hand them.
We talk about:
how identity politics turns people into tribes instead of individuals
the old “guilty of being white” backlash that didn’t start in 2025, it’s been simmering since the 80s
Ruby Ridge and why distrust of federal power doesn’t come out of nowhere
deplatforming, banking bans, and why censorship is like putting duct tape over a smoke alarm
why the answer isn’t left-wing collectivism or right-wing race politics, it’s liberty, equal rights, and personal responsibility
If you want a real alternative to the endless outrage machine, you don’t fix it with more group guilt. You fix it by treating people as individuals and keeping the state out of our lives.
Subscribe for more Disruptarian takes on culture, power, and freedom.