Site icon Disruptarian Blog

The Mutilation of Children in the Name of “Trans-Therapy”

protect the kids from transing

protect the kids from transing

By Ryan “Dickie” Thompson – Disruptarian.com


Introduction: A Punk Rock Reality Check

If you’ve been following the headlines, you’ve probably noticed a disturbing new trend—medical bureaucrats, activist doctors, and self-anointed “gender specialists” are championing what they call “gender-affirming care” for kids. Let’s be clear: this is not “affirmation.” It is not compassion. It is not medicine in the Hippocratic sense.

It is mutilation.

And if you strip away the sanitized buzzwords, the doublespeak, and the “equity & inclusion” slogans plastered over it, that’s all it is. Kids—confused, vulnerable, still developing—are being used as guinea pigs in a social experiment unprecedented in history.

But don’t just take my word for it. Let’s lay out the receipts.

reference to this Tennessee state House of Representatives meeting on HB01 in 2023.


WPATH: The Self-Appointed Authority

At the center of this whole circus sits WPATH—the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. WPATH is the body behind the Standards of Care (SOC), guidelines that have been treated as gospel by hospitals, schools, and woke legislators.

WPATH’s intent is plain: they want to normalize and expand access to medical transition, including for minors. Their bias? Advocacy masquerading as science. And while WPATH is highly influential—many professional medical organizations cite their work—they are not a neutral authority. Their credibility is often challenged because their guidelines lean more activist than evidence-based.

The recent HHS “Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria” report (May 2025) laid this bare. It said the “gold standard” of WPATH guidelines are built on weak evidence, low-quality studies, and ideological assumptions. In other words, WPATH is leading the parade while blindfolded, and kids are paying the price.


What the HHS Report Actually Said

The Trump-ordered HHS report (May 1, 2025) is a bombshell, even if legacy media tried to bury it under outrage pieces. It concluded:

  1. Weak Evidence for Benefits: Studies on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for kids are low-quality, short-term, and often contradictory.
  2. Evidence of Harm Exists: While long-term data is sparse, known risks include sterility, sexual dysfunction, bone loss, and irreversible physical changes.
  3. Medical Transition = Experimental: Treating minors with blockers and surgeries is “experimental” and not backed by credible science.
  4. Psychotherapy Preferred: The report pushed “exploratory therapy” (talk therapy) as a safer path—though even here, evidence is thin.

That’s not me editorializing. That’s the federal government’s own Office of Population Affairs saying: this is not proven medicine, it’s a human experiment.


Suicide: The Emotional Blackmail Card

The biggest club activists swing in this debate is suicide. The line goes: “If you don’t affirm and transition these kids, they’ll kill themselves.”

Matt Walsh, love him or hate him, dismantled this claim in testimony before a state legislature. He pointed out:

This doesn’t trivialize suicide. It recognizes the truth: weaponizing suicide statistics is manipulative and false. If anything, pushing kids into transition may increase suicidality down the line.


Regret and Detransition: Stories They Don’t Want You to Hear

The activist lobby insists regret is “rare.” And sure, systematic reviews peg regret rates at around 1% to 3%. But let’s be blunt: even one child irreversibly sterilized, mutilated, or left suicidal is too many.

And the reality is much grimmer when you start listening to the people themselves:

These aren’t “rare unicorns.” They are canaries in the coal mine.


The Data Nobody Likes to Talk About

Let’s talk numbers for a second.

Here’s the kicker: regret may not even show up for a decade or more. Which means these “low regret” numbers may just be delayed explosions waiting to go off.


The “Mutilation” Question

Some recoil at the word “mutilation.” Let me justify it.

When a 12-year-old is chemically sterilized with puberty blockers, that’s not medicine—it’s sterilization.
When a 15-year-old girl’s healthy breasts are cut off, that’s not therapy—it’s mutilation.
When testosterone deepens a girl’s voice and grows her facial hair forever, that’s not affirmation—it’s irreversible harm.

If we were talking about any other context—say, a religious sect cutting body parts off children—we’d call it abuse, plain and simple. But slap a rainbow flag on it, call it “gender-affirming,” and suddenly it’s celebrated as progressive.


Who’s Driving This?

  1. WPATH & Advocacy Doctors – Setting activist guidelines.
  2. Hospitals & Universities – Like Vanderbilt, openly marketing puberty blockers and mastectomies for minors until public backlash forced “pauses.”
  3. Big Pharma – Every puberty blocker, every hormone prescription is a lifelong customer. That’s a profit stream, not a cure.
  4. Political Actors – Using trans kids as pawns in a culture war, cynically painting any resistance as “hate.”

This isn’t compassion. It’s an industry.


What True Compassion Looks Like

Let’s flip the script. What would real compassion look like?


My Own Story: No Blame, Just Accountability

I don’t write this as an outsider to family trauma. I grew up in a violent home. My brother took his own life under the weight of abuse. I was beaten. I was told I wasn’t enough.

And yet, even at 19, when I wrote my autobiography (link here ), I made a decision: no blame. I owned my failures, my successes. I gave my parents compassion, even as I held myself accountable.

That’s the path I want for my daughter, for your kids, for every kid confused in this upside-down world: responsibility, not blame. Growth, not victimhood.

But what today’s “gender-affirming” industry is selling isn’t accountability. It’s the easy road: blame biology, blame society, blame mom and dad—then cut, drug, and mutilate. That is not a solution. That is surrender.


Conclusion: Punk Rock Parenting

Here’s the truth, raw and uncut: kids are not political props. They’re not lab rats. And they sure as hell aren’t canvas for an activist surgeon’s ideology.

The mutilation of children under the guise of “trans-therapy” is the scandal of our age. Years from now, society will look back in horror, asking how we ever let this happen.

I don’t care if it makes me unpopular with elites or activists—I will stand on this hill: children deserve protection, not mutilation.

Let’s give them time, love, guidance, and yes—boundaries. Let’s reject the lie that the only path to peace is through a scalpel. Let’s stop the experiment before another generation is scarred for life.

Because if we don’t, the regret stories won’t be “rare.” They’ll be everywhere. And the blood will be on our hands.

—Ryan “Dickie” Thompson
Disruptarian.com – The Punk Rock Libertarian Voice

Sources and References

I tried to be balanced, even giving opposing points of view and references in this post.
The ultimate point is, that this transing kids thing is a very new phenomenon and we can not rely on any studies, because there is no long term study to reference. But what we do have, does not show proof that gender affirming care has any positive effect what-so-ever.

Exit mobile version