Disruptive Chat

Disruptarian Community

Tyler Robinson, Antifa, or a Groyper? Untangling the Narrative After Charlie Kirk’s Assassination

by | Sep 14, 2025 | alt left, Censorship, Politics

Let’s cut the crap. A man is dead, and the internet is playing “guess the team colors” of the killer like it’s some sick fantasy football draft. Charlie Kirk—love him or hate him—was a husband, a father, and the loudest conservative campus voice of his generation. He was gunned down at Utah Valley University. That’s the fact. Everything else is spin.

Since the moment Tyler Robinson was named the suspect, two competing storylines have flooded the web:

  1. Robinson was a left-wing Antifa sympathizer with Democratic Socialist ties.
  2. Robinson was a right-wing groyper, secretly aligned with Nick Fuentes.

And both sides are cherry-picking evidence to fit their narrative.

What We Actually Know

  1. The victim. Robinson shot Charlie Kirk—arguably the most recognizable conservative youth activist in America. If Robinson was truly right-wing, then his choice of target makes zero sense. Why assassinate the quarterback of your own team?
  2. The shell casings. The rifle had unfired rounds with messages scrawled on them:
    • “Hey Fascist! Catch! ↑ → ↓↓↓” (classic Antifa symbolism, three downward arrows used since WW2 antifascist resistance).
    • “Oh Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao Chow Chow” (lyrics from an Italian anti-fascist anthem).
    • “If you read this, you are gay, LMAO.” (juvenile trolling, but not exactly conservative hymnals).
    Unless Robinson was running a false-flag cosplay act, these are leftist markers.
  3. The partner. Robinson lived with a transgender partner (male-to-female). According to Fox Digital reporting, that partner is cooperating with the FBI. This isn’t about stigmatizing trans people, but let’s be honest—this personal life profile leans more left than right.
  4. Friends and family. Multiple outlets (The Hill, Lynnwood Times) cite people close to Robinson describing him as anti-conservative, with ties to Democratic socialist groups.
  5. The FBI tip. Robinson’s father reportedly recognized him in FBI surveillance images and urged him to turn himself in. No grand conspiracy there—just a family shattered by what their son did.

The “Conservative Groyper” Narrative

Then you have another angle: Robinson was secretly a groyper. For the uninitiated, groypers are Nick Fuentes followers—an ultra-conservative, Catholic-infused, online troll army. They’re the edgy wing of “America First” conservatism.

Forbes covered Fuentes claiming his movement was being framed. Newsweek and Politifact entertained the possibility that Robinson leaned right. But let’s be blunt: the evidence for this is thin. It rests on two shaky planks:

  • That the Antifa slogans on the bullets were left as fake clues to mislead investigators.
  • That Kirk’s stance against transgender ideology made Robinson’s personal life a motive, even if he was ideologically “right-wing.”

But here’s the problem: if Robinson was a groyper, why leave Antifa graffiti on his ammo? Why live with a trans partner? Why do friends call him anti-conservative? The pieces don’t line up.

This smells like projection, the same way Rosie O’Donnell once claimed the Minneapolis church shooter was MAGA—when the facts later showed otherwise.

Why the Spin Is So Desperate

Neither left nor right wants to own this.

  • If Robinson is Antifa, the left has to face the fact that “punch a fascist” rhetoric escalates into “shoot a conservative.”
  • If Robinson is a groyper, the right has to face that internet radicalization in their ranks can become terrorism.

So both sides fling him at the other like a hot potato. Nobody wants to admit that violent rhetoric, regardless of side, creates killers.

The Libertarian Reality Check

Here’s the punk rock libertarian view:

  • Murder is murder.
  • Political assassination is domestic terrorism.
  • The ideology of the killer doesn’t make the crime better or worse.

Charlie Kirk’s last words were in answer to a question about transgender mass shooters. He said, “Too many.” Seconds later, he was killed. That is the definition of silencing speech with violence.

And if you’re out here celebrating it—or spinning lies to shield your tribe—you’re not principled. You’re not “anti-fascist” or “America First.” You’re just morally bankrupt.

What Should Happen Next

  1. Transparency. The FBI must release communications, texts, and other evidence so the public sees the truth. Half-truths breed conspiracy.
  2. Accountability. If Robinson acted alone, he pays the price. If others aided or abetted him—including his partner—charge them.
  3. Stop Scapegoating. His transgender partner isn’t guilty by association. Neither is an entire ideology. Guilt belongs to the guilty.
  4. Consistency. Hold the same moral line regardless of who the killer voted for. Murder doesn’t get a pass because “our side” did it.

Final Word

The weight of the evidence says Tyler Robinson was left-wing: Antifa slogans, socialist ties, anti-conservative sentiment. The “conservative groyper” narrative looks like spin, a way to dodge responsibility.

But here’s the kicker: even if he was a Fuentes acolyte, it wouldn’t change the evil of the act.

Charlie Kirk is dead because someone hated his ideas so much they chose bullets over debate. That’s the story. That’s the rot. That’s what we must never excuse.

And if you’re still clapping like a seal because you think your team scored points? Congratulations—you’ve become what you say you hate.

— Ryan “Dickie” Thompson, Disruptarian Radio

Sources/URLs

I'll leave you with this song by SOJA “Born In Babylon”

Spun Web Technology SMART SEO

Spun Web Technology SMART SEO

Disruptarian on Rumble

eChaos Music cosplay and steampunk gear and clothing

eChaos Music cosplay and steampunk gear and clothing

Archived with Internet Archive | Powered by Spun Web Archive Forge