The Death of Fair Use? Why H.R. 6028 is a Political Land Grab for Copyright Power
In the quiet, unglamorous corridors of the House of Representatives, a legislative hand grenade was just tossed. They called it the “Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act” (H.R. 6028). They framed it as a boring, technical reorganization—the kind of dry, administrative housekeeping that most people sleep through. But don't let the nomenclature fool you. This isn't a reorganization; it's a decapitation of public interest oversight.
In a recent voice vote, the House rushed H.R. 6028 through without a single meaningful hearing, without public scrutiny, and without the debate that a change of this magnitude demands. The target? The U.S. Copyright Office. The goal? To strip away the last remaining checks and balances that keep this massive, industry-aligned beast from running amok on the digital commons.
The Source: This analysis is based on reporting and documentation from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) regarding the passage of H.R. 6028.
The Mechanics of the Power Grab
To understand why this is a disaster, you have to understand how the Copyright Office currently functions. It isn't just a filing cabinet for songs and scripts. It is an administrative powerhouse that shapes the rules of the digital age. It manages the DMCA Section 1201 rulemaking process—the very process that determines if you can repair your own tractor, conduct security research, or preserve digital history without being sued into oblivion.
H.R. 6028 proposes three fundamental shifts that should make every person who values free expression tremble:
- Severing the Library Connection: Currently, the Copyright Office sits under the supervisory umbrella of the Library of Congress. While the Library is no utopia, its core mission is the preservation of knowledge and public access. This relationship acts as a vital counterweight. H.R. 6028 severs this tie, transferring supervisory powers directly to the Register of Copyrights.
- Politicizing the Register: The bill makes the Register of Copyrights a presidential appointee, subject to Senate confirmation. This moves the office from a realm of administrative expertise into the direct line of fire of partisan politics.
- Consolidating Rulemaking Power: The authority over the critical Section 1201 rulemaking will move from the Librarian of Congress to the Register. This concentrates immense power in a single, politically appointed individual.
A History of Playing for the Wrong Team
The skeptics aren't just being alarmist; they are looking at a track record. The Copyright Office has not historically been a neutral arbiter of the public interest. It has a history of leaning heavily toward the side of massive entertainment conglomerates and legacy media giants.
The EFF notes that the Office’s recent stance on Artificial Intelligence has been a masterclass in prioritizing private licensing markets over the fundamental principle of fair use. Instead of protecting the rights of creators and users to interact with technology, the Office has pushed for models that favor the gatekeepers.
If you need more proof of their bias, look no further than the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). During the era when the internet was fighting for its life against blatant censorship, the Copyright Office was one of the most vocal supporters of that disastrous proposal. They have consistently aligned themselves with the heavy hitters of the industry, often at the expense of educators, libraries, and the average internet user.
[Opinion: This isn't just a pattern of error; it's a pattern of alignment. When the rules are written by those who benefit most from the restriction of information, 'fairness' becomes a secondary concern to 'licensing revenue.']
The Lobbyist's Dream
By making the Register of Copyrights a political appointee, Congress is essentially opening the door for high-stakes lobbying. Under the current structure, the Register is an administrative official. Under H.R. 6028, the Register becomes a political prize.
Imagine the pressure. Every administration will want a Register who aligns with their specific economic and cultural agenda. The massive, well-funded copyright-owning industries—the ones with the deepest pockets and the longest reach in D.C.—will invest even more heavily in ensuring their preferred candidates are installed. We are moving toward a future where copyright policy isn't decided by experts in law and preservation, but by political operatives vetted by industry lobbyists.
The Cost to the Commons
What does this actually mean for you? It means the "progress of science and useful arts"—the very constitutional mandate of copyright law—is being traded for control.
When the Copyright Office loses its connection to the Library of Congress, we lose the voice of the scholar and the archivist. When the rulemaking process becomes a political tool, we lose the ability to fight for exemptions that allow for repair, accessibility, and research. We are witnessing the construction of a digital fortress, where the walls are built by those who own the content, and the gates are guarded by those appointed to protect the profits.
The Senate must act. H.R. 6028 was rushed through the House with zero transparency. It deserves the light of day, the heat of debate, and ultimately, a rejection. The Copyright Office should serve the public—not the presidents, and certainly not the lobbyists.
Stay vigilant. The fight for the digital commons is being fought in the fine print.
Related Reading
Similar posts
2026-08-05 · Radio Shows
The Death of Fair Use? Breaking Down H.R. 6028 and the Copyright Power Grab
The latest Breaking News and Disruptive Views episode examines H.R. 6028, the proposed restructuring of the U.S. Copyright Office, and the political stakes hiding behind supposedly technical legislative language.
2026-08-03 · Music
Power Shows Its Face: Why Liberty Binds Authority Before It Breaks Character
DJ Disruptarian turns a warning about power into a two-tone punk-reggae defense of limited government, divided authority, public accountability, free markets, family, and the rule of law.
Tue, 18 Au · Digital Rights