Disruptarian Radio * NOW PLAYING * DJ Disruptarian – S.P.E.A.R *

Disruptarian Community

The Uncomfortable Truth: How Democratic Socialists Mirror National Socialist Tactics

by | Nov 10, 2025 | Alternative News, Politics, Social Opinions

Trump Loves Epstein says neo-nazi's

A masked crew with swastika flags showed up on the lawn of the New Hampshire State House in Concord. They clashed with people. They waved a sign that read “Trump Loves Epstein.” This was not a Twitter insult. This was the real thing, in public, on camera, and it reveals something the establishment doesn't want you to see.

NHPR reported that the marchers were members of Blood Tribe, a neo-Nazi outfit that travels in packs and stages stunts for attention. They piled into the back of a U-Haul and drove off while bystanders yelled. But here's what matters: these actual National Socialists carried anti-Trump signs. The same people waving swastikas oppose the man the left calls a Nazi every single day.

Let that sink in.

For years, the media and Democratic politicians have thrown “Nazi” at conservatives, Trump supporters, and anyone who questions their agenda. But when real Nazis show up, they're on the left's side of the political spectrum. They oppose Trump. They share the left's contempt for Israel. They believe in central planning and state control.

The uncomfortable truth? National Socialists and Democratic Socialists have more in common than anyone wants to admit. And it's time we stopped pretending otherwise.

When Real Nazis March Against Trump

The “Trump Loves Epstein” banner at Concord wasn't random. Neo-Nazi groups have consistently opposed Trump, recognizing that his policies, support for Israel, opposition to centralized state control, defense of individual gun rights, contradict their authoritarian worldview.

National Socialism was never “right-wing” in the American sense. It was socialism with a racial focus instead of a class focus. The Nazis nationalized industries, banned private gun ownership, controlled media and speech, and built a massive welfare state. Sound familiar?

The Third Reich perfected propaganda tactics through Goebbels's ministry, which controlled film, radio, newspapers, books, theater, and art. The goal was simple: shape perception, control information, rule absolutely. Today's Democratic Socialists pursue the same goal through different means, social media censorship, “fact-checking” operations, deplatforming, and coordination between government and Big Tech. See the Concord footage here: YouTube.

Political Violence: The Left's Weapon of Choice

On September 10, 2025, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, by Tyler Robinson. The murder should have united Americans in horror. Instead, polling revealed a chilling partisan divide.

According to YouGov polling conducted September 11, 2025, when asked if it's acceptable to be happy about the death of a public figure you oppose, 77% of Republicans said it's always unacceptable, compared to only 38% of Democrats. Even more disturbing: 44% of Democrats said it's “sometimes acceptable” to celebrate political deaths.

This isn't just numbers. This is a fundamental difference in how the two sides view political violence. And the left's acceptance of violence doesn't stop with polling.

Antifa, BLM, and Billions in Destruction

The 2020 riots weren't “mostly peaceful protests.” They were coordinated acts of political violence that caused billions of dollars in damage, destroyed minority-owned businesses, and resulted in dozens of deaths.

Antifa operates with clear organizational structure, particularly in Portland, Oregon. Despite media claims that it's “just an idea,” Antifa has identifiable uniforms, logos, coordinated tactics, flags, and command structure. They operate with military-style discipline, attacking journalists, business owners, and political opponents.

Video evidence from Portland shows organized violence, firebombings of federal buildings, and sustained sieges of government facilities. In Minneapolis, police precincts were burned. In Seattle, “autonomous zones” resulted in multiple shootings and deaths. Across America, small businesses, particularly those owned by minorities, were destroyed.

And through it all, Democratic politicians and media outlets downplayed the violence, called it “mostly peaceful,” or justified it as understandable responses to systemic injustice. When Republican Senator Tom Cotton suggested using federal troops to restore order, the New York Times opinion editor was forced to resign for publishing his op-ed.

The message was clear: left-wing political violence is acceptable. Right-wing violence is terrorism.

This is exactly the double standard the Nazi Brownshirts benefited from in Weimar Germany. Street violence was tolerated when it came from the left, normalized, then weaponized for political gain.

Following the Money: Soros, OSF, and the Funding Network

George Soros sits at the center of the left's funding apparatus. His Open Society Foundations has distributed billions to progressive causes worldwide, but the money trail reveals something darker.

Soros's history matters. Born in Budapest in 1930 to a wealthy Jewish family, his father obtained forged papers when Nazis occupied Hungary in 1944. Fourteen-year-old George was placed with a Hungarian official who claimed him as his Christian godson. During this period, Soros accompanied his protector when Jewish property was being confiscated. In his own words from a 1998 60 Minutes interview, Soros acknowledged being present during confiscations and stated he felt “no guilt” because someone else would have taken the property anyway.

Whether Soros was a willing participant or merely present, his later comments about that period reveal a troubling mindset, one that prioritizes survival and self-interest over moral clarity. That same mindset appears to drive his political funding today.

Multiple governments have banned or restricted OSF operations:

  • Russia designated OSF as an “undesirable organization” in 2015, citing national security threats (HRW)
  • Hungary passed “Stop Soros” laws in 2018, forcing OSF to relocate (NPR)
  • Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan have restricted OSF-funded democracy initiatives
  • Belarus shut down OSF offices in 1997

Why would so many countries ban an organization claiming to promote “democracy and human rights”? Because OSF's real goal is destabilization and political control.

Conservative investigators have traced funding from OSF through intermediary networks to Antifa-linked organizations. A roundtable investigation by The National Desk identified OSF, along with Arabella Advisors, Tides Foundation, and Neville Roy Singham, as sources of “dark money” flowing to radical street organizations.

Capital Research Center released a report alleging OSF gave over $80 million to organizations characterized as “pro-terror” or extremist-aligned. The money flows through layers of intermediary groups, making direct attribution difficult but not impossible. The pattern is clear: Soros funds organizations that fund organizations that fund street violence.

When confronted, OSF claims it only funds “civil society organizations working on human rights.” But those organizations include groups directly involved in the 2020 riots, groups that promote defunding police, and groups that support BLM, an organization whose leadership embezzled millions while cities burned.

The Shared Hatred: Democratic Socialists and Antisemitism

One of the most disturbing parallels between National Socialists and today's Democratic Socialists is their shared contempt for Jews and Israel.

In May 2024, Michigan House Republicans introduced a bipartisan resolution to declare May 2 as End Jew-Hatred Day. House Democratic leadership blocked the resolution from reaching a vote.

State Rep. Donni Steele stated: “At this point, House Democrat leadership and these radical protestors are one and the same. Protestors want to ignore the atrocities Hamas committed against the Israeli people last fall, and House Democrats want to ignore the reality that no protest calling for the destruction of Israel could be peaceful.”

After Hamas's October 7, 2023 terrorist attacks, which included rape, torture, and the murder of over 1,200 Israelis including children, campus protests erupted across America. But these weren't protests for peace. They were celebrations of terrorism, calls for Israel's destruction, and expressions of open antisemitism.

Protesters chanted “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” a call for Israel's elimination. They set up encampments, disrupted classes, and harassed Jewish students. And Democratic politicians largely stayed silent or offered weak, qualified condemnations.

The U.S. House voted to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) over her Israel-Hamas rhetoric, with some Democrats joining Republicans. But the fact that it required a formal censure vote reveals how normalized antisemitism has become on the left. (PBS NewsHour)

Republican leadership has repeatedly highlighted Democratic refusal to condemn antisemitic protests and rhetoric from progressive activists. While Democrats condemn antisemitism “in principle,” their actions tell a different story. They tolerate antisemitism from their coalition while calling Trump supporters Nazis.

The Nazis blamed Jews for Germany's problems. Today's Democratic Socialists blame Israel for Middle East instability while ignoring Palestinian terrorism, Iranian aggression, and Arab state oppression. The target is the same. Only the rhetoric has been updated.

The Policy Parallels: Central Planning, Gun Control, and State Power

Strip away the racial ideology of National Socialism and examine its actual policies. What you find is terrifyingly similar to the Democratic Socialist agenda:

Central Planning and Economic Control

National Socialism implemented total state management of the economy, with political control over industry and labor. Private property existed on paper, but the state directed all production, employment, and resource allocation.

Democratic Socialists advocate the same model with different branding. They call for:

  • Government control of healthcare (single-payer systems)
  • State ownership of energy production (Green New Deal)
  • Massive expansion of public housing
  • Federal job guarantees
  • Wealth redistribution through confiscatory taxation
  • Price controls and rent controls
  • Nationalization of key industries

Both systems reject free markets and individual economic liberty. Both place central planners above individual choice. Both claim to act “for the people” while concentrating power in government hands.

Gun Control and Disarmament

One of the Nazi regime's first acts was gun confiscation. The 1938 German Weapons Act prohibited Jews from owning firearms and gave the Nazi government complete control over who could possess weapons.

Democratic Socialists pursue identical goals:

  • “Assault weapon” bans targeting the most effective self-defense firearms
  • Universal registration creating government databases of gun owners
  • Red flag laws allowing confiscation without due process
  • Magazine capacity limits
  • Ammunition restrictions
  • Calls for mandatory buybacks (confiscation with compensation)

The rhetoric is always the same: “common sense gun safety.” But the goal is identical to the Nazi model, disarm the population, eliminate the ability to resist, concentrate the power of force in government hands.

Speech Control and Information Warfare

The Nazi propaganda machine controlled all information. Dissent was criminalized. Books were burned. Media was state-controlled.

Democratic Socialists can't burn books in public squares, yet. But they've built a sophisticated speech control apparatus:

  • Coordination between government and Big Tech to censor “misinformation”
  • Deplatforming of conservative voices
  • “Fact-checking” operations that function as political censorship
  • Hate speech laws that criminalize opinion
  • Campus speech codes that punish dissent
  • DOJ pressure on social media companies to remove content
  • FBI labeling of parents at school board meetings as domestic terrorists

The Biden administration directly instructed the DOJ to pressure Big Tech platforms to censor content. Obama's IRS targeted conservative organizations, denying them tax-exempt status and subjecting them to invasive investigations based solely on political viewpoint. These aren't isolated incidents, they're systematic efforts to control speech and punish dissent.

The Nazi book burnings were public and dramatic. Today's censorship is digital and bureaucratic. But the goal is identical: control information, silence opposition, maintain power.

Political Consolidation and One-Party Rule

The Nazi party eliminated opposition through violence and legal manipulation, eventually establishing one-party rule.

Democratic Socialists pursue the same goal through different tactics:

  • Attempts to eliminate the Electoral College, ensuring permanent Democratic control
  • Court-packing schemes to eliminate judicial independence
  • D.C. and Puerto Rico statehood plans designed to create permanent Senate majorities
  • Voting law changes to eliminate security measures
  • One-party rule in major cities, often for decades
  • Speech codes and cancel culture that punish political dissent
  • Weaponization of federal agencies against political opponents

The Russia collusion hoax was an attempted coup. For three years, Democrats and media outlets spread a conspiracy theory about Trump-Russia collusion, using illegal FISA warrants, FBI surveillance, and special counsel investigations to undermine a sitting president. When that failed, they impeached him twice on fabricated or exaggerated charges.

The January 6 prosecutions represent political persecution of Trump supporters, with hundreds imprisoned for trespassing while Antifa rioters who firebombed federal buildings received minimal sentences or no charges at all.

This is exactly what the Nazis did, weaponize law enforcement and intelligence agencies against political enemies while protecting allies from consequences.

The Cult of “The People”

Both National Socialists and Democratic Socialists claim to represent “the people” against corrupt elites.

For Nazis, “the people” meant the Aryan race. For Democratic Socialists, “the people” means the working class, minorities, and “marginalized communities.” The specific identity changes, but the formula is identical:

  • Define a virtuous “we” (the people)
  • Identify an evil “them” (Jews/Israel for Nazis, “white supremacists”/conservatives for Democrats)
  • Claim all actions are justified to protect “the people” from “them”
  • Concentrate power to “save” the people
  • Eliminate opposition in the name of the people

Once you define a moral “we” versus an immoral “them,” crushing rights becomes not just acceptable but necessary. History warns about this road, whether it's paved with racial nationalism or class warfare.

Why This Matters Now

The Concord neo-Nazi march exposed the rot in political discourse. For years, Democrats and their media allies have called Trump supporters, conservatives, and anyone who questions their agenda “Nazis” and “fascists.”

But when actual Nazis showed up waving swastikas, they carried anti-Trump signs. They aligned with the left's position on Israel. They believe in state control, central planning, and political violence, the same principles Democratic Socialists advocate.

The confusion is intentional. When words lose meaning, extremists thrive. They operate in the chaos while the public argues over definitions.

So here's the truth Democrats don't want you to see: National Socialists and Democratic Socialists share the same fundamental principles:

  • Central planning over individual liberty
  • State control over private enterprise
  • Disarmament of citizens
  • Information control and censorship
  • Political consolidation and one-party rule
  • Contempt for Jews/Israel
  • Tolerance or approval of political violence
  • Rhetoric of “the people” to justify authoritarian control

The differences are mostly superficial, racial nationalism versus class warfare, explicit violence versus systemic coercion, immediate totalitarianism versus incremental authoritarianism.

But the destination is the same: total state power and the elimination of individual liberty.

The Charlie Kirk Reality Check

Charlie Kirk's assassination on September 10, 2025 should have been a wake-up call. A political activist was murdered for his beliefs on a university campus in America.

Instead, 44% of Democrats said celebrating political deaths is “sometimes acceptable.” Think about that. Nearly half of Democrats believes it's okay to celebrate when their political opponents die. (YouGov)

This isn't theoretical. This is measured support for political violence. And it aligns perfectly with what we've seen: tolerance for Antifa violence, justification of BLM riots, silence about left-wing terrorism, and celebration when conservatives are attacked, doxxed, fired, or killed.

The Nazis used the Brownshirts to terrorize opponents before taking power. Today's Democratic Socialists use Antifa, BLM, and campus activists to achieve the same goal, intimidate opposition, normalize violence, and create a climate where dissent is dangerous.

What Must Be Done

You don't beat National Socialists, whether they wave swastikas or pride flags, with performative outrage. You beat them with truth, courage, and unwavering defense of liberty.

  • Name the connections. Stop pretending Democratic Socialism is fundamentally different from National Socialism. They share methods, goals, and increasingly, tactics. The differences are branding and degree, not substance.
  • Expose the funding. Soros and his networks fund organizations that fund organizations that fund street violence. Trace the money. Publish the connections. Make them defend the indefensible. (The National Desk, Capital Research Center)
  • Defend gun rights absolutely. An armed population cannot be subjugated. This is why both Nazis and Democratic Socialists prioritize disarmament. The Second Amendment isn't about hunting, it's about preventing tyranny.
  • Fight speech control everywhere. Whether it's Nazi book burnings or Big Tech censorship, the principle is identical. Demand platforms that respect free speech. Build alternatives if necessary. Never accept government control of information.
  • Call out antisemitism. When the left tolerates or promotes antisemitism, name it. When they side with terrorists over Israel, call it what it is. The pattern is too clear to ignore. (Times of Israel Blogs, Rep. Tom Cole)
  • Reject political violence. Whether it comes from neo-Nazis or Antifa, political violence is unacceptable. But recognize the asymmetry, the left tolerates its extremists while demanding conservatives denounce violence they never committed. (Louder with Crowder)
  • Demand equal justice. January 6 trespassers rot in prison while BLM rioters walk free. Antifa firebombers get probation while conservative protesters get years. This selective prosecution is authoritarian, and it must end.
  • Trust individuals over planners. Every authoritarian movement promises prosperity through central planning. Every one fails. Economic liberty isn't just effective, it's moral. Your life belongs to you, not to planners in Washington.
  • Keep government on a short leash. The Founders understood that concentrated power corrupts absolutely. That's why they built in checks, balances, and limitations. Defend those structures because they're all that stands between liberty and tyranny.

The Line in the Sand

National Socialism murdered millions and plunged the world into war. Democratic Socialism claims different intentions while building the same apparatus of state control.

Maybe Democratic Socialists don't intend concentration camps. Maybe they really believe their central planning will work this time. Maybe they genuinely think censorship and gun control will create safety rather than tyranny.

But intentions don't matter when you're building the machine of authoritarianism. Once you hand the state the power to control speech, confiscate weapons, direct the economy, and punish dissent, you've built the infrastructure of oppression. What happens next depends only on who grabs the controls.

The neo-Nazis in Concord waved swastikas and opposed Trump. They revealed the truth Democrats desperately want to hide: National Socialism and Democratic Socialism occupy the same authoritarian spectrum. They pursue state power through similar methods. They share contempt for individual liberty, free markets, gun rights, free speech, and Israel.

The Nazis didn't start with concentration camps. They started with gun registration, speech control, media coordination, economic planning, political persecution, and street violence against opponents.

Sound familiar?

Concord is a warning. Real neo-Nazis are marching. Real political violence is escalating. Real censorship is expanding. Real gun control is advancing. Real antisemitism is growing. And real authoritarians, on both the explicit National Socialist right and the Democratic Socialist left, are competing to control the machinery of state power.

A free society rejects both paths. It picks liberty over security, markets over planning, speech over censorship, arms over subjugation, and limited government over unlimited power.

The choice is clear. The time is now. The question is whether Americans have the courage to see what's right in front of them and the spine to defend what our ancestors died to preserve.

Don't let them gaslight you. The connections are real. The threat is growing. And your liberty depends on recognizing the truth before it's too late.

By Ryan “Dickie” Thompson | Disruptarian.com

Sources

Counter-sources and denials for contested items

Spun Web Technology SMART SEO

Spun Web Technology SMART SEO

Disruptarian on Rumble

eChaos Music cosplay and steampunk gear and clothing

eChaos Music cosplay and steampunk gear and clothing